eCommerce Law
Imagine receiving medical diagnosis via web. Would the FCC approve it? Not so fast. FCC is concerned that these services would require prioritization for data and real time performance, i.e., reliability of service. The FCC is concerned with equality and at the same time, it is concerned over the critical patient and doctor exchange that requires immediate attention without the possibility of an unexpected emergency situation. The FCC is concerned that during the patient and doctor web-exchange a medical emergency occurs involving the patient when local medical attention is needed. The FCC is focused on equal treatment of data. Consideration for reserving network capacity may not be a solution as it could limit ecommerce. Ideas of data equal treatment and prohibiting prioritization will not allow telemedicine to thrive.
Imagine receiving medical diagnosis via web. Would the FCC approve it? Not so fast. FCC is concerned that these services would require prioritization for data and real time performance, i.e., reliability of service. The FCC is concerned with equality and at the same time, it is concerned over the critical patient and doctor exchange that requires immediate attention without the possibility of an unexpected emergency situation. The FCC is concerned that during the patient and doctor web-exchange a medical emergency occurs involving the patient when local medical attention is needed. The FCC is focused on equal treatment of data. Consideration for reserving network capacity may not be a solution as it could limit ecommerce. Ideas of data equal treatment and prohibiting prioritization will not allow telemedicine to thrive.
Yet not all services exact the same level of demand on
the network. FCC’s Open Internet rules focus on the
following: banning prioritization, equal data treatment, and simplifying service
requirements. It ignores emerging services, possible capacity of the internet,
and the ill effects of blocking bans.
FCC’s Title II regime, Customer Proprietary Network
Information (CPNI) oppose critical aspects likely to benefit telemedicine and
similar services, such as cloud routing, disclosure of CPNI information, and
the possibility of diagnostics.
The benefits of telemedicine could be without
boundaries if the Open Internet Rules embraced the inherent diversity of services
that the internet allows us to receive and deliver. Ecommerce could be fostered.
Lorenzo Law Firm, P.A. copyright 2015
Internet
Law Lawyers │Ecommerce Law Lawyers │Intellectual Property Law Lawyers │Social Media Law Lawyers │Technology
Law Lawyers │Defamation Law Lawyers │Trademark
Law Lawyers
│Copyright Law Lawyers
│Business Law Lawyers │Privacy
Law Lawyers
│General Counsel Lawyers │Computer Law Lawyers │Counselors
& Attorneys at Law
No comments:
Post a Comment